Country | Successes | Barriers |
---|---|---|
Australia | ||
Brunei Darussalam | ||
Cambodia | ||
China | An awareness of suspected cases, be able to sample in time and require laboratory testing. | |
Cook Islands | ||
French Polynesia | ||
Japan | ||
Kiribati | Currently, there is a syndromic system in place to monitor AFR, Diarrhoea and other syndromic diseases | |
Lao People's Democratic Republic | ||
Malaysia | Strong clinical suspicion | Limited internet connection in the remote areas |
Nauru | No surveillance in place | |
Papua New Guinea | Political will and support | There is no funding source |
Philippines | Established reporting system and centralized reports | Access to updated technology |
Singapore | Consistent and reliable notification of arbovirus disease cases from medical practitioners and laboratories to the Health Ministry | Integration of various disease reporting mechanisms in a centralised system would strengthen the capacity for comprehensive surveillance data analyses and sharing of information across One Health agencies |
Vanuatu | Disease surveillance system in place i.e. guidelines regularly updated, case definition in place, weekly reporting of suspected and confirmed cases, regular training conducted. | Turn-over of trained staff affecting awareness and knowledge of case definition and symptoms, no fully dedicated positon for provincial surveillance officers. |
Viet Nam | System across the country, monitor, detect and handle dengue outbreaks as soon as they are detected, community mobilization. | Don’t have enough resources and funds |