Vector surveillance and control

Countries conducting mosquito surveillance, by stage and species identification (ref Q29, 30, 31)

Regional office	Adult surveillancea	Larval/pupal surveillancea	Trapped mosquitoes identified to speciesa
EMRO	17 (81%)	16 (80%)	18 (86%)
EURO	16 (84%)	14 (74%)	16 (84%)
SEARO	6 (67%)	9 (90%)	7 (70%)
WPRO	13 (87%)	13 (87%)	13 (87%)
aOnly countries that responded to Q29, Q30, and Q31, respectively, are included in the denominators when calculating these percentages. These questions were not included in the dataset shared with AMRO for completion; please see the Arbovirus Survey Overview for more information.

Vector control methods used in local jurisdictions in the past two years (either using government staff and resources, or subcontracting to a different entity to do so) (ref Q35)

Regional office	Adulticidinga	Larvicidinga	Insect growth regulatorsa	Wolbachia method	Sterile insect releasea	Nonea
AMRO	24 (46%)	26 (50%)	1 (2%)	3 (6%)	2 (4%)	0 (0%)
EMRO	16 (76%)	16 (76%)	3 (14%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	5 (24%)
EURO	11 (61%)	17 (94%)	3 (17%)	0 (0%)	2 (11%)	0 (0%)
SEARO	10 (100%)	9 (90%)	4 (40%)	2 (20%)	2 (20%)	0 (0%)
WPRO	14 (93%)	12 (80%)	4 (27%)	5 (33%)	1 (7%)	1 (7%)
aOnly countries that responded to Q35 are included in the denominator when calculating these percentages.

Vector indices measured and calculation of infection rates (ref Q37b)

Regional office	Concurrent human casesa	Minimum infection ratea	Vector densitya	Breteau Indexa	House Indexa	Container Indexa
AMRO	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	51 (98%)	51 (98%)	51 (98%)	51 (98%)
EMRO	3 (50%)	1 (17%)	4 (67%)	1 (17%)	1 (17%)	1 (17%)
EURO	2 (40%)	1 (20%)	4 (80%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)
SEARO	0 (0%)	1 (20%)	2 (40%)	4 (80%)	4 (80%)	3 (60%)
WPRO	2 (40%)	0 (0%)	4 (80%)	4 (80%)	3 (60%)	3 (60%)
aOnly countries that responded to Q37b are included in the denominator when calculating these percentages.